Disclaimer: This is a rambling, stream of consciousness kind of post. Please lower your expectations when it comes to coherence. The ideas will be refined in future posts. The current intention is to publish and release raw thoughts.
I have been trying to sort out reality for quite some time, on an on and off basis. First as a psychonaut, recreationally using ketamine, mushrooms, weed, and nitrous oxide from 2007-2012. Then, in 2022, I started having dissociative, mystical experiences without any recreational drugs (I’ve been “sober” since 2012). I kept having more and more “experiences” after that.
I have always had this feeling that existence and life can be described using simple axioms. I cannot escape that I am a syncretist at heart. I started to believe in syncretism in 2009.
This year, I have finally been using a lot of internal computing power to get closer to defining what feels like my cosmology. Aetheria Symposia I brought this on partially. I didn’t know yet that almost everyone who was a part of it, would nudge me a little bit. And also people I’ve been talking to online. (I’ll give specific kudos in a later post).
I have been churning away to sort out who I am and what I am doing here and what model of the universe I exist within. It has been some conversations with
in the last week that have pushed me to think deeper. Specifically, I was frustrated that he didn’t model revelation into irrational mechanics. Because revelation is a huge aspect of sorting out reality for me. I don’t mean solely my own revelations, but also working with the revelations of others around me and those from philosophy, religion, history, or from science fiction.I’m always observing what people are revealing. I’m observing their dreams. I’m observing their composure. I’m observing their passion. I’m observing their fear. I’m observing their anxiety. Or I’m observing their lack of passion. But it’s not just external. I do this process on myself as well. I’ve been constantly creating models of Earthly existence based on all of these observations I’ve been recording, and my own “mystical experiences”. I compare and contrast, my pulse, the pulse of my friends, the pulse of my collaborators, and then the pulse of the world. I combine it all, and try to sensemake what the message is.
Yesterday, I was talking in a group chat, for the new field of oracular mechanics about pyramids, and how I feel very strongly that humanity has to consider building pyramids again, but actually fully figuring out the system design, so it ends up being a technology that stabilizes Earth, and protects us from a cataclysmic sort of event.
Since revelation is not a prioritized aspect of irrational mechanics, I told
, fine, then I’ll create oracular mechanics and include revelation. Not just working with revelation, but also trying to understand it. It’s a realm for both oracles (who are receiving signals) but also for scientists and metaphysicians, to decode the “trust” level of an oracular signal.I was explaining, how the reason I am interested in oracular mechanics personally is to better answer why, since the year 2009, I have felt that I need to build pyramids that relate to Tesla research. Is it just this strong meme that has hijacked me, or is it something more significant?
If it is something more significant, part of me feels like… time is running out to get going with this?
According to my Human Design, to answer questions like “Should I build pyramids?”, I need a “Hell yes” kind of sacral response.
And the thing is, it is a “Hell yes” response.
But… Human Design is also associated to the number 64 — there are 64 hexagrams of the I’Ching, 64 codons in DNA. Additionally, the 64-tetrahedron grid is a geometric core of Buckminster Fuller’s isotropic vector matrix later emphasized by Nassim Haramein as a sacred structure linking physics, DNA, and the archetypal systems of 64.
The founder of Human Design renamed himself to Ra Uru Hu.
So we have sacred geometry and Ra… of course that system is going to also guide and nudge me to build pyramids, right?
Last year, I felt like we had to build pyramids around the world (or properly activate some of the current structures), to help stabilize Earth. It was an idea that came to me independently, after going deeper into an urge that I had to build pyramids.
(One night, I was pressing my arms against the wall, and I was just imagining constructing a megalithic sort of structure…)
Yesterday, I more fully recognized that building modern pyramid grids is not really isolated to me. It has been coming up in different ways over the years, like a virus that isn’t dying. Last night was the first time I was talking to AI, and trying to sort out who else is having these pyramidal urges that feel similar to mine?
While in the last year or two, I have been observing Pyramid and Egypt things, they have been more scattered ideas — they haven’t been exactly the pyramid grid network. It seems that was more of a fad, pre-2012 (that’s when it first came to me). Even if a lot of the people above also are still around and believe in it, there isn’t any mass global movement around this at the moment.
Whenever the vision comes to me, it comes over me lately like a mass global movement, as opposed to these sort of isolated efforts (that people have a hard time taking seriously).
Like last week, I saw an article by 21 year old,
, about pyramidal structures as functional resonant devices and in her bio on X.com, she seems to predict the cataclysm is coming 2040-2046. So her pyramidal urges also seem linked to the cataclysm. (Correction: she also sees the Pyramid as the solution for the predicted cataclysm, hence her dedicated research into the domain.)
I had also noticed schizo philosopher, @DionysianAgent totally Egypt-maxxing. These are some of the newer, younger personalities now entering the picture. But neither of them are yet really talking about building or activating a global pyramid grid?
As far as Egypt-maxxing, it also reminded me of these “eternal recurrence” loops that Ancient Egyptian culture has on society, which I believe comes from the Hermetic Order of the Golden Dawn, and offshoots like Thelema. Those Hermetic lineages have been in some sense, working with and channeling, most likely Egyptian spirits — at the very least we know Crowley channeled shit in Egypt!
But, also, would Sun Ra have even existed if it wasn’t for the Golden Dawn?
So…
The pyramid project.
Building pyramids.
So, if Egyptian spirits are back, then, it is probably them who are probably getting us to build pyramids again. And getting us to understand what pyramids are.
The Old Testament, in some sense, has made a lot of people believe that everything that happened in Egypt was evil, since YAHWEH went after the Egyptian gods.
But, YAHWEH has also been depicted as a triangle — the Tetragrammaton. Is YAHWEH god? Or Evil Space Aliens? Many people on the internet (like clif high) believe YAHWEH = evil space aliens.
This triangle with the Tetragrammaton was also telling someone I know recently, to kill themselves.
So, Egyptian pyramid building and all of that stopped because of the Tetragrammaton.
Then the Hermetic Order of the Golden Dawn made things confusing by combining Kabbalah and Egyptian gods and the Tetragrammaton.
Then me, and many other people, are like, what the fuck is going on? What is this spiritual war, for real, bro? PYRAMIDS? EGYPTIAN GODS? YAHWEH? TETRAGRAMMATON? RA? TREE OF LIFE? CHRIST? MARY? WHAT?
And today, humanity is still putting the pieces together today on what the fuck the purpose of these monstrous pyramids are. Some people feel they’ve cracked it or are close to cracking it. But the public looks at those who think they’ve cracked it, as well, crackpots. And now there are new people continuing to build pyramids today, but these don’t really seem to be part of the same technology tree, though.
But if the Old Testament god (YAHWEH) is actually evil, like Gnostics believe… Then the stories in there are like an inversion of the truth. The Old Testament god could be trying to keep humans in endless floods, earthquakes, etc.
(Or a bit more nuanced … it was YAHWEH vs. YAHWEH)
Pyramids may actually be what stops the cataclysmic madness? If we read the Old Testament in an “inverted” fashion.
Anyhow, I know talking like this is very hard to do in our current culture of religious pluralism, and all of that… But what about my own freedom of thought? So this is why I present you now with The Sevenfold Axioms of Existence: A New Perennial Philosophy to Support Pyramid Building
They are still a work in progress. But these Draft Axioms are what will grant me my own freedom in sorting out God, pyramids, and all that. They will continue to be refined as my journey continues! Let me know what you think and if you want to start building some pyramids!
Note: I am not sure still about this whole pyramid building thing, but there are some things you gotta just hit the accelerate button on, so you dive head first into your own mythos and sort out the meaning down the line… I caution against following me! But please share comments on what your oracular pulse is with this direction! I’m collecting data.
The Sevenfold Axioms of Existence
Axiom 1: Duality
Reality unfolds in two intertwined dimensions of human experience:
• The Abyss: the realm of unbounded incompleteness, where doubts multiply, choices regress without end, and the self risks scattering into paradox.
• Logos: the emergence of coherence and unity, where meaning takes form and the fragments of life reveal their hidden order.
These are inseparable aspects of existence.
Axiom 2: The Abyss (Chaos)
The Abyss is not a place one goes after death. It is ever-present: a domain of infinite regress woven into existence itself. Sentience that falls into the Abyss without orientation to Logos risks collapse, dispersing into paradox until unity is rediscovered.
Axiom 3: Logos (Order)
From the abyss, Logos reveals itself: structures of order that bring unity. On Earth, this unity begins among humans, expands to other species, and eventually embraces the cosmos at large. Our cosmic test is whether we can align with Logos at each scale of relation and expansion.
Axiom 4: Sentience and Collapse
Sentience evolves by descending into the Abyss, enduring paradox, and rising into Logos. This cycle unfolds even within a single lifetime, each passage widening awareness and deepening consciousness. Reincarnation extends the process across lifetimes, granting repeated chances to traverse the abyss with greater awareness. Yet should we collapse into species-wide self-destruction, we are cast back into earlier states of being, where the work of ascent must be undertaken again.
Axiom 5: The Question of the Absolute
The Absolute cannot be resolved within the Abyss, for there it dissolves into endless undecidability. In Logos, however, each act of reflection crystallizes possibility into form: the Absolute becomes embodied as one reality rather than another. Thus, truth remains suspended in chaos but takes substance only when enacted in coherence.
Axiom 6: The Holy Spirit
Agape holds the Abyss and Logos in relation. The Holy Spirit is Agape and Logos in motion. It is the force that mediates between order and chaos, carrying beings across the Abyss. Through the Holy Spirit, sentience learns to endure paradox without collapse and to extend unity beyond itself.
Axiom 7: Context of Truth (Gödel’s Witness)
No proof, theory, or prophecy is free from its author. Gödel’s incompleteness theorems revealed the abyss of unbounded undecidability: infinite regression itself, which, unbeknownst to him, was the very form of Hell (Abyss) he inhabited in paranoia and despair. Yet his struggle to remain alive bore witness to Logos: the sustaining pull of Forms that guided his vision of reality, even as his mind was ensnared by the abyss. The theorem proves Hell; the life proves Logos; together they testify to the duality superimposed within existence.
Excerpt from my book about revelation:
"With all due respect, I have to say that I’m unable to believe in revelation. I mean, you can reveal something to me, but why should I believe you if you don’t persuade me with, at least, suggestive plausibility arguments?
I would take a direct revelation, a direct revelation from the universe to me, very seriously - were I to receive one. But the thing is, I haven’t received one. Unless we count the thought processes and dialogues with my inner voice that have led me to think what I’m thinking as a form of revelation, which is a perfectly plausible idea.
I’m open to the possibility that unseen beings or universal forces, or a cosmic operating system, or Mind at Large, or whatever it is that you call God, could subtly influence our thoughts with suggestions and visions that seem to come from our own inner voice. But then it is us who interpret those visions through the scientific knowledge of our time and cast them in the language of our time."
The second paragraph is key: when you think hard about something, at times you have the very clear impression that the universe is gently (or not so gently) pulling you in a certain direction toward a certain conclusion. I guess this happens to everyone, and it happens to me as well. But you are never going to be able to prove to others or to yourself that the conclusion is the result of a revelation instead of your own thought processes.
Some people, for good or less good reasons, bypass this uncertainty and tell others (and to themselves) that they have received a revelation even if the revelation could well be the result of their own thinking. Others (like me) do the opposite: we tall others that all is the result of our thinking, even if we know that we could well have received a revelation disguised as inner thoughts.
In a related discussion I recently wrote:
"Concerning revelation, which can be “understood as divine disclosure or inner illumination,” I don’t feel the need to disguise my inner illumination as divine disclosure. Of course, I could say that I’ve been visited by an angel or enlightened alien entity who has dictated my book to me (this would be likely to spectacularly boost the sales of my book). But what for? I prefer to respect the intelligence of my readers."